Activ8 Insights
← All reports
NASDAQ:NVDA05/13/2026

Culper Research Report on NVIDIA Corp

$224.99
Open on report
$206.84
Close on report
-8.07%
% since report

Culper Research on Nvidia Corp


Bottom Line

The allegation. Culper Research alleges that Nvidia, despite claiming its China compute business went to zero after April 2025 U.S. trade restrictions, continued to derive over 20% of FY 2026 compute revenues from China via illegal GPU diversion and Southeast Asian intermediaries secretly financed by Alibaba.
The company. Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the world's largest company by market capitalization and dominant supplier of AI GPUs, whose data center compute business depends heavily on demand from hyperscalers including, the report alleges, Chinese end users operating through a network of Southeast Asian intermediaries.
The point. As Beijing now actively blocks Nvidia imports in favor of domestic alternatives and U.S. investigators circle multiple Nvidia partners, Culper believes Nvidia faces a massive air gap in its FY 2027/CY 2026 revenue estimates. The China business Jensen Huang claimed went to zero a year ago is only now actually going to zero.

Activ8 Report Assessment

Activ8 evaluates every investigator report across three dimensions: the nature of the thesis, the type of evidence supporting it, and the catalyst for stock repricing. Scores are derived solely from the source report. New to these dimensions? Read our guide.

Thesis Classifies the nature of the investigator’s central claim. Structural/Valuation concerns overpricing or business erosion. Governance covers conflicts of interest, self-dealing, or oversight failures. Fraud/Deception involves deliberate misrepresentation, concealment, or securities violations.
Fraud / DeceptionGovernance

Culper alleges Nvidia deliberately misled investors by claiming China compute revenues went to zero after April 2025 while continuing to service Chinese demand through intermediaries. CEO Jensen Huang is alleged to have maintained a personally close relationship with Megaspeed's Alice Huang and to have been present at Megaspeed-linked data centers alongside Alibaba representatives, which Culper characterizes as a governance and concealment concern.

Not Present: Structural / Valuation

Evidence Type Describes the primary type of evidence supporting the thesis. Analytical relies on financial modeling, peer comparisons, or pattern-based inference. Documentary uses SEC filings, court records, or regulatory documents. Primary involves original investigation such as FOIA requests, interviews, site visits, or proprietary research.
AnalyticalDocumentaryPrimary

The report draws on trade records (Tradesparq), Singapore and Malaysian corporate filings, Megaspeed and Speedmatrix financial statements, and Apex Enterprise Solutions annual reports. It also incorporates on-the-record and anonymous testimony from current and former Nvidia employees, Megaspeed employees, and Chinese tech executives, as well as quantitative analysis comparing IDC market share data against Nvidia's own revenue disclosures.

Downside Catalyst Indicates whether a specific event could force the market to reprice the stock. Thesis-Only means no identifiable trigger. Pending Catalyst means a likely catalyst exists without an exact date. Specific Event means a concrete, datable event has been identified.
Pending CatalystSpecific Event

The March 2026 DoJ indictment of three Supermicro-linked individuals for $2.5 billion in smuggling is an identified specific event already underway. Ongoing investigations by U.S. Commerce and Singapore authorities into Megaspeed, plus Senators Banks and Warren's March 23, 2026 letter requesting immediate pausing of all Nvidia export licenses for Southeast Asia, are near-term pending catalysts with no fixed resolution date.

Not Present: Thesis-Only


How Nvidia Makes Money

Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA) designs and sells graphics processing units and system-on-chip units, with its Data Center segment, which sells AI compute GPUs including the H100, H200, and Blackwell series, now accounting for the vast majority of revenues. Nvidia sells through OEM partners and channel intermediaries rather than directly to end users, and reports revenues based on customers' headquarters location. The company reported $19.7 billion in China revenues in FY 2026 and has claimed zero compute share in China since April 2025 U.S. export control restrictions took effect, a claim central to Culper's short thesis.


Main Report Evidence

Alibaba-Linked Shell Financed $4+ Billion in Nvidia Server Purchases

Apex Enterprise Solutions (Singapore), whose corporate parent is Alibaba Group, recorded $4.1 billion in prepayments and $4.2 billion in loans payable to Alibaba as of March 31, 2025, each account up more than 10x from 2024 levels. Culper's documentary evidence links Apex to Speedmatrix via a June 2024 charge filed in Malaysia in which Speedmatrix pledged its entire business as collateral to Apex, two months before commencing operations. Apex's financials also disclose that subsequent to March 31, 2025, the company made additional payments of more than $4.2 billion 'for services to be performed,' which Culper believes flowed into Megaspeed/Speedmatrix for further Nvidia-powered server purchases.

Apex Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) — Balance Sheet, YE March 31, 2025 (Singapore Filings)

Balance Sheet Item Amount (USD)
Prepayment and other receivablesOver $4.1 billion
Loans payable to related companies (Alibaba)$4.2 billion
Subsequent payments for services (post March 31, 2025)Over $4.2 billion
Megaspeed 'refundable deposits received' (year-end 2024)$2.9 billion
Megaspeed 'amounts due from subsidiaries' (year-end 2024)$2.9 billion
Speedmatrix PP&E added in 2024 (server equipment)~$1.9 billion USD (8.5 billion RM)

Source: Apex Annual Report for YE March 31, 2025, filed in Singapore; Speedmatrix Malaysia Filings, Statement of Charges Filed June 18, 2024


Key Allegations

01

China Revenue Did Not Go to Zero

Culper Research alleges that despite CEO Jensen Huang repeatedly claiming Nvidia is '100% out of China' with zero compute share, over 20% of Nvidia's FY 2026 compute revenues remained driven by Chinese demand via Southeast Asian intermediaries and illegal diversion. A former Nvidia director-level employee estimated Chinese demand accounted for '20% to 40%' of data center revenues even after April 2025 restrictions, while IDC data cited by Reuters showed Nvidia shipped approximately 2.2 million cards in China in 2025 with 55% market share, far exceeding what Nvidia's own disclosed H20 revenues of approximately $7.2 billion would imply at $10,000–$12,000 per card.

02

Alibaba Secretly Financed Megaspeed via Singapore Shell

Culper uncovered Singapore filings showing that Apex Enterprise Solutions, whose sole stated purpose is 'providing procurement activities' and whose corporate parent is Alibaba Group, held $4.2 billion in loans payable to Alibaba as of March 31, 2025. In June 2024, Speedmatrix (Megaspeed's Malaysian subsidiary) filed a charge pledging its entire business as collateral to Apex, two months before commencing operations. Culper alleges this structure allowed Alibaba to effectively finance billions in Nvidia-powered server purchases while Nvidia publicly vouched that Megaspeed was 'wholly owned and operated by a company based and headquartered outside China, with no China shareholders,' a characterization that, per Culper, deliberately omits the question of financing.

03

Aivres Systems: A De Facto China Supply Channel

Trade records reviewed by Culper show that from December 2024 through January 2026, Speedmatrix imported $4.6 billion in product, of which $4.0 billion originated from Aivres Systems Inc., an Nvidia Elite OEM compute partner formerly known as Inspur Systems Inc. that rebranded after its Chinese parent, Inspur Group, was placed on the U.S. entity list. Aivres remains one-third owned by Inspur Group, just under the 50% restriction threshold. Culper also notes the WSJ reported Aivres would supply $2.5 billion in Blackwell chips to Malaysian cloud operator Aolani to lease to ByteDance, and that Aivres previously supplied servers via Indosat to Shanghai-based INF Tech, founded by a former Alibaba VP. Culper concludes that 'Aivres' business remains, in effect, a China-dedicated supply channel.'

04

Jensen Huang Personally Present at Every Step

Culper alleges Jensen Huang maintained an 'uncomfortably close relationship' with Megaspeed's Alice Huang, a Chinese national. He was photographed with her in June 2024, the same month the Apex/Alibaba pledge was filed and Megaspeed committed to $2 billion in GPU purchases, and again in Taiwan in May 2025, weeks after U.S. trade restrictions were announced. A current Megaspeed employee told Culper that Jensen visits Megaspeed-linked data centers 'every few months' and 'every single time' is accompanied by Alibaba representatives, characterizing the relationship as 'very close' and adding that Alice Huang 'is actually still our boss' despite media reports otherwise.

05

China Now Cutting Nvidia Out; Massive Revenue Air Gap Ahead

Culper argues that while analysts treat China as potential upside for Nvidia, Beijing's late 2025 and early 2026 policies, including a November 2025 directive banning foreign AI chips from state-funded data centers, January 2026 border blocks on H200 shipments, and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's April 22, 2026 Senate testimony that China has bought 'zero H200 chips,' mean Nvidia is now actually losing the business Jensen Huang claimed went to zero a year ago. Culper's trade record analysis shows Aivres shipped zero chips to Megaspeed in Q1 2026, while mainland Chinese operators told Culper there are 'very few orders in China,' calling it 'a huge blow to Nvidia financially.'


Disclaimer

The information provided on Activ8Insights.com—including all articles, reports, commentary, and associated content—is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All views and opinions presented aim to promote transparency and critical dialogue around activist investing—particularly short activism—and should not be interpreted as personalized financial advice. Investors are solely responsible for their own due diligence and investment decisions, based on publicly available information and their individual financial circumstances. Contributors to or affiliates of Activ8Insights may hold long or short positions in the securities mentioned. These positions may change at any time without notice, and there is no obligation to disclose such changes after publication. Any market data listed is data at the most recent market close. Market data may be delayed or changed after publication on Activ8Insights.com.